Detection and mitigation of interference in a multimode receiver using variable bandwidth filter

ABSTRACT

Embodiments include a novel receiver architecture to optimize receiver performance in the presence of interference. In various embodiments, power estimation circuits are used to determine the exact nature of the interference and to optimize the performance correspondingly. Variable selectivity of at least one power estimation circuit is achieved using a filter with variable bandwidth, with power measurements taken using different bandwidth settings. Also, the actual method of optimizing the receiver performance is novel compared to the prior art in that the gain settings and the baseband filter order (stages to be used) will be optimized based on the nature of the interference as determined by the power detector measurements. For a device such as a cellular phone that operates in a dynamic and changing environment where interference is variable, embodiments advantageously provide the capability to modify the receiver&#39;s operational state depending on the interference.

RELATED APPLICATION

This application is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/279,764, filed on Oct. 24, 2011, scheduled to be issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,494,469 on Jul. 23, 2013, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference as if set forth in their entirety.

FIELD

The present disclosure relates to receiver architectures in a communications system, and more particularly, some embodiments relate to methods and apparatuses for detecting and mitigating interference and optimizing receiver performance.

BACKGROUND

Radio frequency transceivers in cellular systems commonly receive and decode a desired signal in the presence of interference, which has commonly required a compromise in receiver performance. For example, in order to prevent clipping due to interference, several stages of narrow analog filters are typically found in conventional receiver designs. Such filters add current drain and distort the desired signal, thus degrading receiver performance. Additionally, the active stages of the receiver, particularly the radio frequency (RF) stages, are designed with high levels of linearity so that distortion is minimized in the presence of interference. This linearity often requires relatively high bias conditions and therefore requires relatively high current drain.

A typical prior art receiver architecture is shown in FIG. 1. This architecture represents a typical receiver implementation and is described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,498,926 to Ciccarelli et al. Within receiver 100, the transmitted RF signal is received by antenna 112, routed through duplexer 114, and provided to low noise amplifier (LNA) 116, which amplifies the RF signal and provides the signal to bandpass filter 118. Bandpass filter 118 filters the signal to remove some of the spurious signals which can cause intermodulation products in the subsequent stages. The filtered signal is provided to mixer 120, which downconverts the signal to an intermediate frequency (IF) with a sinusoidal signal from local oscillator 122. The IF signal is provided to bandpass filter 124, which filters spurious signals and downconversion products prior to the subsequent downconversion stage. The filtered IF signal is provided to variable gain amplifier (VGA) 126, which amplifies the signal with a variable gain to provide an IF signal at the required amplitude. The gain is controlled by a control signal from AGC control circuit 128. The IF signal is provided to demodulator 130, which demodulates the signal in accordance with the modulation format used at the transmitter (not shown).

For this prior art architecture, the local oscillator signal (LO) is either tuned to match the radio frequency signal (RF), so that the received signal is converted directly to baseband, or it is tuned to convert the received RF signal to some much lower intermediate frequency (IF) for further filtering. At baseband or IF, the filters are set to the bandwidth of the particular RF system to receive the desired signal and remove interference.

The architecture in FIG. 1 is designed to receive the desired signal in the presence of interference. The filter at baseband or IF is set to remove completely any interference, and the RF stage gain and bias are set to receive the signal with interference with minimal distortion. Thus, such a conventional system makes assumptions about the presence of interference, which may reduce interference at the expense of receiver performance when the expected interference is present, but which may constitute a wasteful approach when such assumptions are incorrect.

Another prior art receiver architecture is disclosed at FIG. 2 of U.S. Pat. No. 6,498,926 to Ciccarelli et al. In this prior art architecture, post-demodulation quality is used to set the bias conditions and therefore the linearity of the RF circuits. This prior art approach does not address the problem fully because the receiver state is adjusted based only on the baseband data quality measurement, which might be degraded for numerous reasons and not just due to interference and/or reduced RF linearity. Also, this architecture does not do anything to reduce the filtering requirement to match the actual interference conditions.

Another prior art receiver architecture is disclosed at U.S. Pat. No. 6,670,901 to Brueske et al. This prior art architecture includes an on-channel power detector, a wide band power detector, and an off-channel power detector. The wideband detector and off-channel detector will indicate if high levels of interference are present and allow adjustment of the receiver bias based on that. This prior art architecture suggests using the information from these power detectors to adjust the dynamic range of several blocks (LNA, mixer, filter, analog-to-digital (A/D) converter, and digital filter). By adjusting the dynamic range and/or bias of these stages, the current drain can be optimized. However, this prior art approach uses wideband detection without selectivity and therefore is unable to distinguish out-of-band interference, i.e., interference that is several channels away, from nearby interference in the adjacent or nearby channels. Therefore, the architecture cannot fully optimize the performance of the receiver.

Since an actual device such as a cellular phone operates in a dynamic and changing environment where interference is variable, it is desirable to be able to modify the receiver's operational state depending on the interference.

SUMMARY

In some embodiments of the present disclosure, an apparatus includes a first amplifier configured to amplify an input signal. A mixer is coupled to the first amplifier. The mixer is configured to mix the amplified input signal outputted by the first amplifier with an oscillator signal, to provide a mixed signal. A first estimation circuit is configured to measure voltage or power of the mixed signal. A first filter is configured to filter the mixed signal. The first filter may be a baseband filter and has a bandwidth adjustable to include a first bandwidth. A second amplifier is configured to amplify an output of the first filter. A second estimation circuit is configured to measure voltage or power at an output of the second amplifier. A state machine is coupled to the first and second estimation circuits. The state machine is configured to provide feedback to the first and second amplifiers, to the first filters, and to the mixer. The state machine is configured to increase a bias current of the first amplifier and/or the mixer, or decrease a gain of the first amplifier and/or the mixer, or both increase the bias current and decrease the gain, when the voltage or power measured by the first estimation circuit is greater than a first predetermined threshold, the voltage or power measured by the second estimation circuit is less than a second predetermined threshold, and the first filter is set to the first bandwidth. The state machine is further configured to decrease a gain of the first amplifier, the second amplifier, and/or the mixer when the voltage or power measured by the second estimation circuit is greater than the second predetermined threshold and the first filter is set to the first bandwidth. The apparatus may include a second filter configured to filter the output of the second amplifier. The state machine may be further configured to provide feedback to the second filter, to bypass the second filter when the voltage or power measured by the second estimation circuit with the first filter set to the second bandwidth is less than a third predetermined threshold.

In some embodiments of the present disclosure, an apparatus includes a first amplifier configured to amplify an input signal. A mixer is coupled to the first amplifier. The mixer is configured to mix the amplified input signal outputted by the first amplifier with an oscillator signal, to provide a mixed signal. A first estimation circuit is configured to measure voltage or power of the mixed signal. A first filter is configured to filter the mixed signal. The first filter may be a baseband filter and has a bandwidth adjustable to include a first bandwidth and a second bandwidth. The second bandwidth corresponds to a narrower band of frequencies than the first bandwidth. A second amplifier is configured to amplify an output of the first filter. A second estimation circuit is configured to measure voltage or power at an output of the second amplifier. A second filter is configured to filter the output of the second amplifier. A state machine is coupled to the first and second estimation circuits. The state machine is configured to provide feedback to the first and second amplifiers, to the first and second filters, and to the mixer. The state machine is configured to bypass the second filter when the voltage or power measured by the second estimation circuit with the first filter set to the second bandwidth is less than a predetermined threshold.

In some embodiments, an input signal is amplified to provide an amplified input signal, which is mixed with an oscillator signal to provide a mixed signal. The voltage or power of the mixed signal is measured. The mixed signal is filtered with a first filter having a bandwidth adjustable to include a first bandwidth, to provide a first filtered signal, which is amplified to provide a first amplified signal. The voltage or power of the first amplified signal is measured. If the measured voltage or power of the mixed signal is greater than a predetermined threshold T1 and the measurement at Pdet2 is less than a predetermined threshold T2 with the first filter set to the first bandwidth, then a bias current used for the amplifying the input signal, and/or for the mixing may be increased. If the measured voltage or power of the first amplified signal is greater than the predetermined threshold T2 with the first filter set to the first bandwidth, then a gain used for at least one of the amplifying the first filtered signal, the amplifying the input signal, and the mixing may be decreased.

In some embodiments, an input signal is amplified to provide an amplified input signal, which is mixed with an oscillator signal to provide a mixed signal. The voltage or power of the mixed signal is measured. The mixed signal is filtered with a first filter having a bandwidth adjustable to include a first bandwidth, to provide a first filtered signal, which is amplified to provide a first amplified signal. The voltage or power of the first amplified signal is measured. The first amplified signal is filtered to pass a second band of frequencies narrower than the first band, to provide a second filtered signal. If the measured voltage or power of the mixed signal is greater than a predetermined threshold T1 and the measurement at Pdet2 is less than a predetermined threshold T2 with the first filter set to the first bandwidth, then a gain used for the amplifying the input signal and/or the mixing may be decreased. If the measured voltage or power of the first amplified signal is greater than the predetermined threshold T2 with the first filter set to the first bandwidth, then a gain used for at least one of the amplifying the first filtered signal, the amplifying the input signal, and the mixing may be decreased.

In some embodiments, an input signal is amplified to provide an amplified input signal, which is mixed with an oscillator signal to provide a mixed signal. The voltage or power of the mixed signal is measured. The mixed signal is filtered with a first filter having a bandwidth adjustable to include a first bandwidth and a second bandwidth narrower than the first bandwidth, to provide a first filtered signal, which is amplified to provide a first amplified signal. The voltage or power of the first amplified signal is measured. The first amplified signal is filtered with a second filter, to provide a second filtered signal. If the measured voltage or power of the first amplified signal is less than a predetermined threshold with the first filter set to the second bandwidth, then the second filter may be bypassed.

In some embodiments, an apparatus includes first and second receiver modules in a multiple input multiple output (MIMO) communications system, first and second estimation circuits, and a state machine. The first and second receiver modules are configured to process a first input signal and a second input signal, respectively Each receiver module includes a first amplifier configured to amplify the corresponding input signal, and a mixer coupled to the first amplifier, with the mixer configured to mix the amplified input signal outputted by the first amplifier with an oscillator signal, to provide a mixed signal. Each receiver module also includes a first filter configured to filter the mixed signal, with the first filter having a bandwidth adjustable to include a first bandwidth. Each receiver module also includes a second amplifier configured to amplify an output of the first filter. The first estimation circuit is configured to measure voltage or power of the mixed signal of the first receiver module. The second estimation circuit is configured to measure voltage or power at an output of the second amplifier of the first receiver module. The state machine is coupled to the first and second estimation circuits. The state machine is configured to provide feedback to the first and second amplifiers of the second receiver module, to the first filters of the second receiver module, and to the mixer of the second receiver module. The state machine is configured to increase a bias current of at least one of the first amplifier of the second receiver module and the mixer of the second receiver module, or decrease a gain of at least one of the first amplifier of the second receiver module and the mixer of the second receiver module, or both increase the bias current and decrease the gain, when the voltage or power measured by the first estimation circuit is greater than a first predetermined threshold and the voltage or power measured by the second estimation circuit is less than a second predetermined threshold with the first filter of the first receiver module set to the first bandwidth. The state machine is further configured to decrease a gain of at least one of the first amplifier of the second receiver module, the second amplifier of the second receiver module, and the mixer of the second receiver module when the voltage or power measured by the second estimation circuit is greater than the second predetermined threshold with the first filter of the first receiver module set to the first bandwidth.

Each receiver module in the MIMO system may further include a second filter configured to filter the output of the second amplifier of that receiver module. The state machine may be further configured to provide feedback to the second filter of the second receiver module, to bypass the second filter of the second receiver module when the voltage or power measured by the second estimation circuit, with the first filter of the first receiver module set to the second bandwidth, is less than a third predetermined threshold.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The following will be apparent from elements of the figures, which are provided for illustrative purposes and are not necessarily to scale.

FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a receiver architecture known in the prior art.

FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a system architecture in accordance with some embodiments of the present disclosure.

FIG. 3 is an illustration of how the bandwidth of a filter may be tuned to different frequency ranges in accordance with some embodiments.

FIG. 4A-C are depictions of various interference scenarios in accordance with some embodiments.

FIG. 5 is a flow diagram of a process in accordance with some embodiments.

FIG. 6 is a flow diagram of a process in accordance with some embodiments.

FIG. 7 is a block diagram of a multiple input multiple output (MIMO) receiver architecture in accordance with some embodiments.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

This description of the exemplary embodiments is intended to be read in connection with the accompanying drawings, which are to be considered part of the entire written description.

Embodiments of the present disclosure provide a novel receiver architecture to optimize receiver performance in the presence of interference. In various embodiments, estimation circuits are used to determine the exact nature of the interference and to optimize the performance correspondingly. Variable selectivity of at least one estimation circuit is achieved using a filter with variable bandwidth, with voltage or power measurements taken using different bandwidth settings. Also, the actual method of optimizing the receiver performance is novel compared to the prior art in that the gain settings and the baseband filter order (stages to be used) will be optimized based on the nature of the interference as determined by the measurements from the estimation circuits.

FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a system architecture of a receiver 200 in accordance with some embodiments of the present disclosure. An input signal 202 is received, e.g., from an antenna. The input signal is shown in differential form (RF_RX+ and RF_RX−); other signals in FIG. 2 may be in differential form but are not labeled as such, for visual clarity and to reduce clutter. The input signal is amplified by a low noise amplifier (LNA) 204 to provide an amplified input signal 214. A local oscillator 210 generates one or more oscillator signals 212 (e.g., sinusoids) based on signals 208 from a synthesizer 206. A mixer 216 mixes the amplified input signal 214 with the oscillator signal 212. The mixer may include channels 216 a and 216 b, one of which may process an in-phase component and one of which may process a quadrature component. Separate processing pathways are shown in FIG. 2 for the in-phase and quadrature components (with similar reference characters but different suffixes, “a” or “b”), but the processing is similar for each, so the discussion below focuses on the top pathway in FIG. 2, which may be an in-phase or quadrature path. It is to be understood that the various feedback effects from state machine 254 to components such as filters and amplifiers may apply to components in either the in-phase or quadrature path or using both.

Mixed signal 218 a provided by mixer 216 is processed by a series of filters 222 a and 232 a, which may be baseband filters that provide progressively more rejection. For example, filter 222 a may have a wider bandwidth than filter 232 a. These filters implement the overall interference rejection of the baseband, and they may have programmable bandwidths with many different settings. For example, a multimode receiver may have bandwidths from 100 kHz up to 10 MHz to support the various modes like Global System for Mobile communications (GSM), Time Division-Synchronous Code Division Multiple Access (TD-SCDMA), Wideband Code Division Multiple Access (WCDMA), Long Term Evolution (LTE), LTE-Advanced, and other communication standards as is known in the art. Also, the filters provide progressively more rejection as one moves further toward the output (toward the right side of FIG. 2). The architecture also uses estimation circuits 220 and 230 (labeled Pdet1 and Pdet2 for convenience). Estimation circuits 220 and 230 may measure (estimate) power, e.g., by measuring voltage and computing power therefrom (because power and voltage are directly related), and are referred to herein as power estimation circuits. These power estimation circuits may be connected to either or both the in-phase and quadrature paths of the receiver. Also, these power estimation circuits may be implemented as any kind of detector, e.g. a peak detector, power detector, or any other kind of power estimation circuit as understood by one of ordinary skill in the art. Gain adjustment may be provided by a post-mixer amplifier (PMA) 226 a and variable gain amplifier (VGA) 246 a. Power estimation circuit 220 may measure power at mixer output 218 a, and power estimation circuit 230 may measure power at an PMA output 228 a.

Thus, mixed signal 218 is filtered by filter 222 a to provide signal 224 a, which is amplified to provide signal 228 a. The amplified signal 228 a is filtered to provide signal 234 a, which is amplified to provide signal 248 a. A logic module 250 includes a received signal strength indication (RSSI) module 252, which measures voltage or power and provides an output 253 to an RF interference mitigation state machine 254. RSSI 252 is described further below. State machine 254 receives inputs from power estimation circuits 220 and 230 and from RSSI 252, and provides feedback to LNA 204, PMA 226 a and 226 b, and VGA 246 a and 246 b. State machine 254 also may provide signals to filters 222 a and/or 232 a, and their counterparts 222 b and/or 232 b, to enable one or more of the filters to be enabled as discussed further below. Logic module 250 may be coupled to a transmitter (not shown), which may provide a signal to an antenna for transmission.

The multimode receiver architecture supports several bandwidth settings for the filters including filter 222 a. The receiver architecture may support GSM, TD-SCDMA, WCDMA, and LTE (multiple bandwidth options) using the same baseband chain. From these various standards, typical baseband bandwidth options of 100 kHz, 600 kHz, 2 MHz, 2.5 MHz, 5 MHz, 7.5 MHz, and 10 MHz may be supported.

FIG. 3 illustrates how the bandwidth of filter 222 a may be tuned to different frequency ranges. The frequency response to PMA output may be variable, e.g., with filter 222 a having a bandwidth adjustable to wide, medium, and narrow settings. For example, in FIG. 3, frequency response plots 320 narrow setting for filter 222 a), 330 (medium setting), and 340 (wide setting) are shown, along with frequency content of a desired signal 310.

As illustrated in FIG. 3, some embodiments of the present disclosure measure the level of the interference using Pdet2 and optimize the receiver based on the interference estimation. This technique may be used to determine what interference scenario exists as discussed below in the context of FIGS. 4A-C and then to configure the receiver for optimal performance as discussed below in the section “Optimal Receiver Configuration.”

State machine 254, which may be a digital state machine that may be implemented in various ways, controls circuitry in receiver 200 to perform power estimation and RSSI measurements, determine the optimum configuration for the RF circuits, and provide feedback accordingly. Such feedback may include setting of the bandwidth of one or more filters, possibly bypassing certain filter stages if not needed, and/or modifying the gain and bias of the amplifier and/or mixer stages.

FIGS. 4A-C illustrate three different interference scenarios. Scenario 1, shown in FIG. 4A, is an out of band interference case where the frequency of interference signal 420 (fint) is relatively far away (out of band denoted as foob) from the desired signal 410, i.e., fint>foob. Scenario 2, shown in FIG. 4B, is an intermediate interference case where the interference 430 is contained in a region below (lower in frequency than) the out of band region but not in the adjacent channel, i.e., fib1<fint<foob, where fib1 denotes an in-band limit. Scenario 3, shown in FIG. 4C, is an adjacent channel and/or proximate narrowband interference case. Interference 440 is at a lower frequency than fib1 in this case. For each scenario, the power estimation circuits 220 and 230 in FIG. 2 will respond differently, as described in the various cases listed in Table 1 below. In Table 1, BBF1 and BBF2 refer to filters 222 a and 232 a, respectively (or filters 222 b and 232 b, respectively, if the lower processing path in FIG. 2 is applicable). One possible set of power detector responses uses wide and narrow filter settings as in FIG. 3 for filter 222 a, with setting1 in Table 1 corresponding to wide and setting2 corresponding to narrow. In other words, state machine 254 directs that power measurements be taken using two different filter settings having different bandwidths. Filter setting pairings other than wide/narrow are possible as well for the cases and logic in Table 1. For example, again referring to FIG. 3, setting1 in Table 1 may be wide and setting2 may be medium, or setting1 may be medium and setting2 may be narrow. Such differential use of bandwidths (with setting1 wider in bandwidth than setting2) enables information to be gleaned regarding the nature of interference.

TABLE 1 Cases for different regimes based on power measurements and filter settings Pdet2 Pdet2 measurement measurement Interference Pdet1 (setting1 for (setting2 for Case Region measurement filter 222a) filter 222a) State Machine Action Case 1 Interference Pdet1 > Pdet2 < Pdet2 < LNA or Mixer Bias Region 1 threshold1 threshold2 threshold2 Increase and/or LNA and/or Mixer gain decrease BBF2 may be bypassed Case 2 Interference Pdet1 < Pdet2 > Pdet2 < PMA gain decreased Region 2 threshold1 threshold2 threshold2 BBF2 may be bypassed Case 3 Interference Pdet1 > Pdet2 > Pdet2 < LNA and/or Mixer Region 2 threshold1 threshold2 threshold2 gain decrease BBF2 may be bypassed Case 4 Interference Pdet1 < Pdet2 > Pdet2 > PMA gain decreased Region 3 threshold1 threshold2 threshold2 All filters enabled Case 5 Interference Pdet1 > Pdet2 > Pdet2 > LNA and/or Mixer Region 3 threshold1 threshold2 threshold2 gain decrease All filters enabled

State machine 254 directs power estimators 220 and 230 to perform power estimation measurements, and based on the measurements, employs logic according to the relevant case. The thresholds threshold1 and threshold2 may be predetermined (e.g., based on the interference level that is desired to be detected, for example with threshold1=−35 dBm and threshold2=−52 dBm) and form the basis for comparisons as shown in Table 1. A threshold threshold3, against which a Pdet2 measurement may be compared to determine whether to bypass BBF2, may also be predetermined, e.g., threshold3=−70 dBm.

By employing a filter with variable bandwidth in a dynamic manner (e.g., taking one measurement at a first bandwidth and another measurement at a second bandwidth), embodiments of the present disclosure identify the region of interference and may intelligently take action accordingly (through state machine 254) to mitigate such interference. Such processing is dynamic, enabling efficient adaptation to various interference conditions, and is not pre-wired like prior art approaches that may degrade performance unnecessarily due to flawed assumptions about interference.

Optimal Receiver Configuration

For these five different cases, the radio circuits may be configured optimally in a manner that varies from nominal operation as follows. Nominal operation may include enabling the baseband filters 222 a and 232 a, and employing predetermined gain settings that maximize the receiver's signal to noise ratio (SNR).

In case 1, state machine 254 may send feedback that results in bypassing filter 232 a. A bias current of LNA 204 and/or of mixer 216 may be reduced, or a gain of LNA 204 and/or of mixer 216 may be decreased, or both the bias current may be increased and the gain decreased, to improve the linearity of the RF stages.

In case 2, filter 232 a may be bypassed. Gain of PMA 226 a may be decreased to improve linearity of the receiver.

In case 3 filter 232 a may be bypassed. Gain of LNA 204 and/or of mixer 216 may be decreased to improve the linearity of the receiver.

In case 4, both baseband filters 222 a and 232 a may be enabled. Gain of PMA 226 a may be decreased to improve linearity of the receiver.

In case 5, both baseband filters 222 a and 232 a may be enabled. Gain of LNA 204 and/or of mixer 216 may be decreased to improve linearity of the receiver.

State machine 254 may send signals 260 a, 260 b instructing the use of various numbers of filters as specified in the cases above.

In some embodiments, periodically, after the operation of the receiver is modified, the estimation readings for the nominal operation case may be rechecked to determine the new optimal configuration. Thus, this architecture allows the optimal operation to change dynamically with changing interference conditions. The periodicity may be constrained by certain factors. On the minimum side, the minimum periodicity may be determined by the ability of the estimation circuits to perform actual measurements (e.g., 10 μsec to hundreds of μsec) and the typical slot size for cellular communication systems. Several parameters such as gain are often held constant during a slot to ensure good quality signal without excessive transients during the slot. Based on these two constraints, the minimum periodicity of the state change may be on the order of a slot length or approximately 500-700 μsec. On the maximum side, the periodicity might be dictated by the slowest expected variation of signal conditions for a device such as a cellular phone. This can be calculated from the Doppler shift due to a 2 GHz carrier travelling at pedestrian speeds of, e.g., 3 km/hr to be about 100 msec. Therefore, on the high end the periodicity may be approximately 100 msec.

One factor that may determine the periodicity of the operation is a channel quality metric such as SNR (signal to noise ratio) estimation or block level error rate (BLER). Channel quality metrics such as SNR estimation and block level error rate may be calculated at a channel quality estimator 272 in logic module 250. These metrics are estimated using the techniques applicable in a typical cellular standard, as is understood by one of ordinary skill in the art. A typical method for calculating block error rate is to perform cyclic redundancy checks on blocks of bits and calculating a running total of the ratio of blocks that fail this check to the total number of blocks received. These metrics may be measured continually at channel quality estimator 272 and may indicate whether the signal conditions are poor, which may indicate that interference is present and thus should be evaluated more frequently. Thus, in some embodiments, operation proceeds with the lowest rate until a quality metric exceeds a predetermined threshold. When this happens, the updates may become more frequent based on logic and control at a rate update logic module 270 of logic module 250. A number of thresholds may be predetermined that set operation in, e.g., a high update rate, medium update rate, and slow update rate depending on the signal conditions.

Example Filter Parameters

The baseband filter stages may be implemented in various ways to provide progressively narrower bandwidths. For example, filter 222 a may be implemented as a 3 pole filter and filter 232 a may be implemented as a 4 pole/2 zero filter.

A number of different interference regions, e.g., three interference regions, may be the basis for operation in different modes. A breakdown of interference regions may be as follows. Interference region 3 may correspond to any signal that is more than eight times the channel bandwidth away in frequency from a desired signal. Interference region 2 may correspond to any signal that is between around two times the channel bandwidth and eight times the channel bandwidth away in frequency. Interference region 1 may correspond to any signal around one times the channel bandwidth away in frequency, i.e., the adjacent channel. This breakdown results in the following interference regions shown in Table 2 for different common communications standards.

TABLE 2 Interference regions for various communications standards Interference Interference Interference Standard Channel BW Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 GSM/Edge 200 kHz 200 kHz offset 400 kHz to 1.6 MHz >1.6 MHz TD-SCDMA 1.6 MHz 1.6 MHz offset 3.2 MHz to 12.8 MHz >12.8 MHz LTE (3 MHz) 3 MHz 3 MHz offset   6 MHz to 24 MHz >24 MHz WCDMA 5 MHz 5 MHz offset  10 MHz to 40 MHz >40 MHz LTE (5 MHz) 5 MHz 5 MHz offset  10 MHz to 40 MHz >40 MHz

Filter 222 a may be described in terms of the amount of rejection in the three interference regions for each bandwidth setting. Some exemplary numbers for the rejection are shown in Table 3.

TABLE 3 Rejection for various bandwidth settings Interference Interference Filter Region 1 Region 2 Interference Region 3 Filter 222a setting1  0 dB <15 dB >25 dB Filter 222a setting2 24 dB   50 dB >70 dB

As an example, suppose it is desired to detect interference of >−30 dBm. Then, power estimation thresholds for the power estimation circuits may be set as follows: threshold for Pdet1=−35 dBm, threshold for Pdet2=−52 dBm with filter 222 a set to a first bandwidth setting (setting1), and threshold for Pdet2=−70 dBm with filter 222 a set to a second bandwidth setting (setting2). The “Yes” and “No” designations below (determined by state machine 254) in Tables 4-6 indicate whether the corresponding suggested threshold is exceeded for the particular power estimation circuit.

TABLE 4 Example for signal in interference region 3 with power = −30 dBm Power measurement referenced to antenna Logic related to threshold Pdet1 = −30 dBm >−35 dBm - Yes Pdet2 setting1 ≦ −55 dBm >−52 dBm - No Pdet2 setting2 ≦ −100 dBm >−70 dBm - No

TABLE 5 Example for signal in interference region 2 with power = −30 dBm Power measurement referenced to antenna Logic related to threshold Pdet1 = −30 dBm >−35 dBm - Yes Pdet2 setting1 ≧ −45 dBm >−52 dBm - Yes Pdet2 setting2 = −80 dBm >−70 dBm - No

TABLE 6 Example for signal in interference region 1 with power = −30 dBm Power measurement referenced to antenna Logic related to threshold Pdet1 = −30 dBm >−35 dBm - Yes Pdet2 setting1 ≧ −30 dBm >−60 dBm - Yes Pdet2 setting2 = −54 dBm >−70 dBm - Yes

Thus, embodiments of the present disclosure may determine that an interference signal is present with >−35 dBm power and may identify which frequency region the interference inhabits. This is just one scenario and many other possible detection levels, methods, and offsets are possible.

State machine 254 may send signals 260 d, 260 e, 260 f, 260 g to adjust gain and/or bias of various system components as shown in FIG. 2. The receiver architecture may include an LNA, mixer, and local oscillator (LO) chain that drives the mixer as shown in FIG. 2. In a typical case, the linearity of the RF circuits may be evaluated using the 1 dB compression point metric. This metric indicates the point at which the circuits become compressed and therefore is the maximum interference level that can be allowed for good quality reception. The 1 dB compression point may be determined either by the biasing of the transistors used in the LNA and mixer or by the amount of bias used in the LO chain depending on the architecture of the circuits. In a typical case, the 1 dB compression point may be adjusted to be around −30 dBm in order to save current. If interference is detected to be >−30 dBm, then a typical change in bias current of 5-10 mA may provide a 10 dB increase in 1 dB compression point to be >−20 dBm.

Alternatively, a gain change may be implemented to achieve the increase in the 1 dB compression point. For example, if the circuits are operated in a low bias condition with a 1 dB compression point around −30 dBm, then a 10 dB reduction in gain may increase the compression point to >−20 dBm. Thus, some embodiments may include a 5-10 dB gain change that increases the 1 dB compression point of the RF circuits by the equivalent 5-10 dB. A gain change combined with a bias change may provide an increase in 1 dB compression point of between 15 and 20 dB.

A factor that may determine whether to improve the linearity with a gain and/or bias change is the received signal strength indication (RSSI) provided by RSSI module 252. The improvement in linearity using a gain change also degrades the signal to noise performance since the noise figure of the RF circuits is increased. Because of this, some embodiments may use an RSSI threshold to determine at what point a gain change is to be used. In some embodiments, this RSSI threshold sets a level that must be exceeded before a gain change will be used to improve the linearity. In general, however, since the gain change method uses reduced bias and therefore less current drain, if the RSSI threshold is exceeded, a gain change is used rather than a bias change.

FIG. 5 is a flow diagram of a process 500 in accordance with some embodiments. After process 500 begins, an input signal (e.g., signal 202) is amplified (block 510), to provide an amplified input signal (e.g., signal 214), which is mixed (block 520) with an oscillator signal (e.g., signal 212), to provide a mixed signal (e.g., signal 218 a). The voltage or power of the mixed signal is measured (block 530), e.g., at Pdet1 shown in FIG. 2. The mixed signal is filtered (block 540) with a first filter (e.g., filter 222 a) having a bandwidth adjustable to include a first bandwidth, to provide a first filtered signal (e.g., signal 224 a), which is amplified (block 550) to provide a first amplified signal (e.g., signal 228 a). The voltage or power of the first amplified signal is measured (block 560), e.g., at Pdet2 shown in FIG. 2. If the measurement at Pdet1 is greater than a predetermined threshold T1 and the measurement at Pdet2 with the first filter set to the first bandwidth is less than a predetermined threshold T2 (comparison 572), then a gain used for the amplifying the input signal, or for the mixing, or for both, may be decreased, or a bias current used for the amplifying the input signal, or for the mixing, or for both, may be increased. Based on an RSSI measurement, which may be computed at RSSI module 252 in FIG. 2, and a comparison with an RSSI threshold (comparison 574), gain may be decreased or bias current may be increased as shown in FIG. 5 (blocks 580, 582). If the measurement at Pdet2 is greater than the predetermined threshold T2 (comparison 576), then a gain used for at least one of the amplifying the first filtered signal, the amplifying the input signal, and the mixing may be decreased (block 584).

State machine 254 may provide feedback via signal 260 a to vary the gain of VGA 246 a. The gain change may offset any gain changes in the LNA 204, mixer 216, and/or PMA 226 b. A gain change in the VGA 246 a will generally not improve the linearity of the receiver with interference since this VGA stage is after all the filter stages. However, if the gain of the LNA, mixer, and/or PMA is changed in order to improve the linearity, the gain of the VGA may be adjusted to compensate for the reduction of gain in those stages.

FIG. 6 is a flow diagram of a process 600 in accordance with some embodiments. After process 600 begins, an input signal (e.g., signal 202) is amplified (block 610), to provide an amplified input signal (e.g., signal 214), which is mixed (block 612) with an oscillator signal (e.g., signal 212), to provide a mixed signal (e.g., signal 218 a). The power of the mixed signal is measured (block 614), e.g., at Pdet1 shown in FIG. 2. The mixed signal is filtered (block 616), with a first filter (e.g., filter 222 a) having a bandwidth adjustable to include a first bandwidth and a second bandwidth narrower than the first bandwidth, to provide a first filtered signal (e.g., signal 224 a), which is amplified (block 618) to provide a first amplified signal (e.g., signal 228 a). The voltage or power of the first amplified signal is measured (block 620), e.g., at Pdet2 shown in FIG. 2. A second filter (e.g., filter 232 a) is provided (block 622) to filter the first amplified signal, to provide a second filtered signal (e.g., signal 234 a). If the measured voltage or power of the first amplified signal, with the first filter set to the second bandwidth, is less than a predetermined threshold, then the second filter is bypassed (block 624). In other words, the second filter is disabled when a predetermined condition is met (when the measured voltage or power of the first amplified signal, with the first filter set to the second bandwidth, is less than a predetermined threshold).

The receiver architecture of FIG. 2 may also be implemented efficiently for a MIMO (multiple input multiple output) system as shown in FIG. 7. Because of the MIMO requirements for 3G and 4G cellular systems, a diversity receiver is often included in the RF and baseband architecture. This additional receiver is not needed for GSM/Edge mode and therefore may be used to perform the power estimation functionality shown in FIG. 2. Based on this information and other factors described above (e.g., regarding various cases and interference regions), the mode of the receiver(s) may be optimally configured based on the determined interference level and/or the frequency of the interference.

FIG. 7 shows a receiver module 710 b, which may receive an input from a primary receive antenna 712 b, and a receiver module 710 a, which may receive an input from a diversity antenna 712 a. Processing in each of the receiver modules is similar to processing discussed above in the context of FIG. 2, and only certain differences from FIG. 2 are discussed below. The diversity receiver module 710 a may be used for voltage or power estimation at estimation circuits 720 (labeled Pdet1) and 730 (Pdet2). State machine 754 may provide feedback signals as shown in FIG. 7, to control the use of filters, bandwidth of a filter (e.g., variable bandwidth filter 722 a-1 or 722 a-2), gain, and/or bias currents in a manner similar to that described above.

The use of the diversity receiver in some embodiments to perform interference estimation in parallel provides several advantages. One advantage is that the diversity receiver can be adjusted to any bandwidth option that is desired at any time in order to detect interference. The primary receiver is tasked with receiving the desired signal and therefore the baseband filters have limited bandwidth during the desired reception slot to limit noise and interference. The diversity receiver, when used for interference detection, has no such limitation, so the bandwidth can be increased as desired. Another advantage is that the diversity receiver gain may be adjusted for the best performance to check the interference without considering the desired signal. The primary receiver must receive the desired signal and therefore the gain control is set to optimize the level of that signal. The diversity receiver, when used for interference detection, is again not constrained by the need to receive the desired signal, and therefore the gain may be optimized to detect interference.

Although examples are illustrated and described herein, embodiments are nevertheless not limited to the details shown, since various modifications and structural changes may be made therein by those of ordinary skill within the scope and range of equivalents of the claims. 

What is claimed is:
 1. An apparatus comprising: a state machine coupled to a first estimation circuit and a second estimation circuit, the state machine configured to provide feedback to a first amplifier and a second amplifier, to a first filter, and to a mixer, the state machine configured to increase a bias current of at least one of the first amplifier and the mixer, or decrease a gain of at least one of the first amplifier and the mixer, or both increase the bias current and decrease the gain, when a voltage or power measured by the first estimation circuit is greater than a first predetermined threshold, a voltage or power measured by the second estimation circuit is less than a second predetermined threshold, and the first filter is set to a first bandwidth, the state machine further configured to decrease a gain of at least one of the first amplifier, the second amplifier, and the mixer when the voltage or power measured by the second estimation circuit is greater than the second predetermined threshold and the first filter is set to the first bandwidth.
 2. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the state machine is configured to decrease the gain of the second amplifier when the voltage or power measured by the first estimation circuit is less than the first predetermined threshold, the voltage or power measured by the second estimation circuit is greater than the second predetermined threshold, and the first filter is set to the first bandwidth.
 3. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the state machine is configured to decrease the gain of at least one of the first amplifier and the mixer when the voltage or power measured by the first estimation circuit is greater than the first predetermined threshold, the voltage or power measured by the second estimation circuit is greater than the second predetermined threshold, and the first filter is set to the first bandwidth.
 4. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the state machine is further configured to decrease the gain of the second amplifier when the voltage or power measured by the first estimation circuit is less than the first predetermined threshold, the voltage or power measured by the second estimation circuit is greater than the second predetermined threshold, and the first filter is set to the second bandwidth.
 5. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the state machine is further configured to decrease the gain of at least one of the first amplifier and the mixer when the voltage or power measured by the first estimation circuit is greater than the first predetermined threshold, the voltage or power measured by the second estimation circuit is greater than the second predetermined threshold, and the first filter is set to the second bandwidth.
 6. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the first estimation circuit is configured to measure voltage or power at an in-phase output of the mixer.
 7. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the first estimation circuit is configured to measure voltage or power at a quadrature output of the mixer.
 8. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the state machine is configured to check an output of the first estimation circuit periodically.
 9. The apparatus of claim 8, wherein the period for checking the output of the first estimation circuit is between 500 μsec and 100 msec.
 10. The apparatus of claim 8, further including: a channel quality estimator configured to provide a channel quality metric; and a rate update logic module configured to increase the period for checking the output of the first estimation circuit, when the channel quality metric is greater than a predetermined quality threshold.
 11. An apparatus comprising: a state machine coupled to a first estimation circuit and a second estimation circuit, the state machine configured to provide feedback to a first amplifier and a second amplifier, to a first filter and a second filter, and to a mixer, the state machine configured to bypass the second filter when a voltage or power measured at an output of the second amplifier by the second estimation circuit with the first filter set to a predetermined bandwidth is less than a predetermined threshold.
 12. A method comprising: mixing an amplified input signal with an oscillator signal, to provide a mixed signal; measuring voltage or power of the mixed signal; filtering the mixed signal, with a first filter having a bandwidth adjustable to include a first bandwidth and a second bandwidth narrower than the first bandwidth, to provide a first filtered signal; amplifying the first filtered signal, to provide a first amplified signal; measuring voltage or power of the first amplified signal; increasing a bias current used for at least one of the amplifying the input signal and the mixing, when the measured voltage or power of the mixed signal is greater than a first predetermined threshold, the measured voltage or power of the first amplified signal is less than a second predetermined threshold, and the first filter is set to the first bandwidth; and decreasing a gain used for at least one of the amplifying the first filtered signal, the amplifying the input signal, and the mixing, when the measured voltage or power of the first amplified signal is greater than the second predetermined threshold and the first filter is set to the first bandwidth.
 13. The method of claim 12, wherein decreasing the gain used for at least one of the amplifying the first filtered signal, the amplifying the input signal, and the mixing comprises decreasing the gain used for amplifying the first filtered signal, when the measured voltage or power of the mixed signal is less than the first predetermined threshold, the measured voltage or power of the first amplified signal is greater than the second predetermined threshold, and the first filter is set to the first bandwidth.
 14. The method of claim 12, wherein decreasing the gain used for at least one of the amplifying the first filtered signal, the amplifying the input signal, and the mixing comprises decreasing the gain used for at least one of the amplifying the input signal and the mixing, when the measured voltage or power of the mixed signal is greater than the first predetermined threshold, the measured voltage or power of the first amplified signal is greater than the second predetermined threshold, and the first filter is set to the first bandwidth.
 15. The method of claim 12, further including: providing a second filter to filter the first filtered signal, to provide a second filtered signal; and bypassing the second filter when the measured voltage or power of the first amplified signal with the first filter set to the second bandwidth is less than a third predetermined threshold.
 16. The method of claim 12, wherein decreasing the gain used for at least one of the amplifying the first filtered signal, the amplifying the input signal, and the mixing comprises decreasing the gain used for amplifying the first filtered signal, when the measured voltage or power of the mixed signal is less than the first predetermined threshold, the measured voltage or power of the first amplified signal is greater than the second predetermined threshold, and the first filter is set to the second bandwidth.
 17. The method of claim 16, further including: filtering the first amplified signal with a second filter, to provide a second filtered signal; amplifying an output of the second filter, to provide a second amplified signal; measuring power of the second amplified signal; and determining whether the measured power of the second amplified signal exceeds a predetermined received signal strength indication (RSSI) threshold; wherein the increasing the bias current used for the at least one of the amplifying the input signal and the mixing is responsive to a determination that the measured power of the second amplified signal does not exceed the predetermined RSSI threshold.
 18. The method of claim 12, wherein the decreasing the gain used for at least one of the amplifying the first filtered signal, the amplifying the input signal, and the mixing comprises decreasing the gain used for at least one of the amplifying the input signal and the mixing, when the measured voltage or power of the mixed signal is greater than the first predetermined threshold, the measured voltage or power of the first amplified signal is greater than the second predetermined threshold, and the first filter is set to the second bandwidth.
 19. A method comprising: mixing an amplified input signal with an oscillator signal, to provide a mixed signal; measuring voltage or power of the mixed signal; filtering the mixed signal, with a first filter having a bandwidth adjustable to include a first bandwidth and a second bandwidth narrower than the first bandwidth, to provide a first filtered signal; amplifying the first filtered signal, to provide a first amplified signal; measuring voltage or power of the first amplified signal; decreasing a gain used for at least one of the amplifying the input signal and the mixing, when the measured voltage or power of the mixed signal is greater than a first predetermined threshold, the measured voltage or power of the first amplified signal is less than a second predetermined threshold, and the first filter is set to the first bandwidth; and decreasing a gain used for at least one of the amplifying the first filtered signal, the amplifying the input signal, and the mixing, when the measured voltage or power of the first amplified signal is greater than the second predetermined threshold and the first filter is set to the first bandwidth.
 20. The method of claim 19, wherein decreasing the gain used for at least one of the amplifying the first filtered signal, the amplifying the input signal, and the mixing comprises decreasing the gain used for amplifying the first filtered signal, when the measured voltage or power of the mixed signal is less than the first predetermined threshold, the measured voltage or power of the first amplified signal is greater than the second predetermined threshold, and the first filter is set to the first bandwidth. 